Curious.. So a Traditional IRA contributions are tax-deductible, however if you attain certified retirement age and begin making withdrawals, these distributions are taxed as common earnings, proper?
So would not that imply that every one the expansion gained over time, by curiosity and dividends, is included in these distributions and taxed as common earnings (typically at a a lot greater fee than capital beneficial properties)?
Whereas Roth IRA contributions are after-tax (i.e. not tax deductible) however the distributions at retirement age are tax free. So all that progress from curiosity and dividends is rarely taxed?
Am I lacking one thing right here or understanding this incorrectly? Based on this it looks like Roth IRA would virtually at all times be the higher choice (except you’d be in a far decrease tax bracket come retirement) since you’re not paying taxes on all that progress. The solely different argument I can consider in assist of Traditional could be the time worth of cash.