Time for an additional of our mega-game benchmarks masking 45 titles evaluating the Radeon RX 6700 XT head-to-head in opposition to the GeForce RTX 3070, the closest competitor by way of pricing, not less than primarily based on the legendary MSRP.
When we reviewed the Radeon RX 6700 XT on day one, we discovered it to be about 4% slower than the RTX 3070 in a 14-game pattern. We collected that knowledge utilizing our older Ryzen 9 3950X check system. But now we now have an much more strong set of 45 video games operating on high of a Ryzen 9 5950X together with the newest show drivers which have introduced some good positive factors for the RTX 3070 in titles corresponding to Godfall, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, and Dirt 5.
Unfortunately, whereas efficiency in some video games has improved, availability has not, with each GPUs almost at all times out of inventory. With inventory clearly out of everybody’s management, this comparability serves as a information for these researching what they may buy as soon as provide is ready to meet or exceed demand.
There’s at all times an opportunity, in case you’re affected person sufficient, you’ll finally get your arms on certainly one of these GPUs. At some level, the scenario will enhance and when it does, this comparability assessment will assist reply the query, which of the 2 GPUs must you purchase? So, with that, let’s go over the check system specs and leap into the benchmarks.
Our Ryzen 9 5950X check system was geared up with 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 dual-rank reminiscence. Representing each the GeForce and Radeon GPUs are Gigabyte Gaming OC graphics playing cards, however do notice that in each circumstances we have clocked them to match the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT reference spec with no overclocking. We’re utilizing GeForce Game Ready Driver 465.89 and Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.3.2 drivers. Smart Access Memory was not enabled and that is at all times the case except specified in any other case.
First, we’ll individually check out round half a dozen of the extra attention-grabbing video games by way of check outcomes after which leap into breakdown graphs to summarize all of the benchmark knowledge.
Starting with Apex Legends we discover that at 1080p, the RTX 3070 is as much as 22% quicker which is sort of a major margin. It’s value noting that the 6700 XT did common 162 fps utilizing prime quality settings, so for aggressive high quality settings body charges are going to be greater than ample with both product, however in case you’re after most efficiency in Apex, you’ll be higher off with the GeForce.
The RTX 3070 was additionally 19% quicker at 1440p and for these utilizing the high-quality settings, the distinction between 113 and 135 fps will be observed with a excessive refresh fee monitor.
Performance was extra evenly matched in CoD Warzone because the RTX 3070 was ~3% quicker at 1080p and eight% quicker at 1440p. The margin does divulge heart’s contents to 12% in favor of the GeForce at 4K, although I believe few players can be concentrating on 4K with these GPUs.
Fortnite has at all times closely favored Nvidia, although AMD has made some inroads right here. Still, when in comparison with the RTX 3070, the 6700 XT was fairly a bit slower, trailing by a 14% margin at 1080p, 17% at 1440p, and 20% at 4K.
Assuming you could have a comparatively trendy CPU that isn’t being closely utilized when enjoying Fortnite, the RTX 3070 goes to ship significantly higher efficiency than the 6700 XT on this title (DLSS/RT dialog apart).
Performance in Hitman 2 may be very related on both GPU. The RTX 3070 was as soon as once more quicker in any respect three examined resolutions, although we’re a comparatively small 6% efficiency benefit.
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 is closely CPU sure at 1080p and because of this, each the 6700 XT and RTX 3070 are seen delivering roughly the identical efficiency.
However, this modifications at 1440p, the 1% low consequence remains to be CPU restricted, however the common body fee is now a lot greater utilizing the RTX 3070. A 23% efficiency uplift is critical. That margin is prolonged at 4K to 26%, although neither GPU is able to delivering playable efficiency at 4K.
Borderlands 3 is the primary recreation that we come throughout the place the 6700 XT is quicker than the RTX 3070 by an affordable margin. At 1080p the Radeon GPU was 12% quicker, then 13% quicker at 1440p earlier than dropping again to a 7% lead at 4K. A win right here for AMD and the efficiency uplift at 1440p can be observed for these enjoying Borderlands 3.
Frame charges are additionally aggressive in Cyberpunk 2077 (earlier than enabling DLSS). The RTX 3070 and 6700 XT ship nearly an identical efficiency at 1080p and 1440p, with the GeForce GPU operating away at 4K with a 17% benefit, although as was the case in Flight Simulator 2020, efficiency at 4K was not playable with these settings.
Control is a horrible state of affairs for AMD and that’s largely attributable to it being an Nvidia sponsored recreation that was used to showcase RTX options. AMD hasn’t been capable of optimize for this one and because of this the RTX 3070 was clearly quicker at 1080p with an enormous 28% margin, then 31% quicker at 1440p and 38% quicker at 4K.
We discover efficiency in Red Dead Redemption 2 to be very aggressive with nothing separating these two GPUs at 1080p and 1440p. As normal, the RTX 3070 enjoys a efficiency benefit at 4K, pulling away by a 9% margin to common 51 fps.
The Outer Worlds is predicated on Unreal Engine 4 and as is usually the case with video games utilizing this extremely widespread recreation engine, the outcomes swing closely in Nvidia’s favor. Here the RTX 3070 was 17% quicker at 1080p, 29% quicker at 1440p and 28% quicker at 4K. Like Control that is one other wipeout for AMD.
Although efficiency for the RTX 3070 has improved in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla since our final check, the 6700 XT nonetheless enjoys a efficiency benefit right here. We’re an 18% win at 1080p for AMD and 10% at 1440p. At 4K, the RTX 3070 does get a slight higher hand although.
Moving on to F1 2020, we discover pretty aggressive efficiency throughout the three examined resolutions. The RTX 3070 was 4% quicker at 1080p, 8% quicker at 1440p and 9% quicker at 4K. Perhaps most significantly, we’re 15-20% higher 1% low efficiency with the GeForce GPU.
Forza Horizon 4 has made it again into our benchmark suite due to its migration from the Windows Store to Steam. For a very long time, this recreation closely favored AMD GPUs, however Nvidia has addressed efficiency and now we’re a scenario the place the RTX 3070 is an effective bit quicker than the 6700 XT, successful by a 15% margin at 1080p, 14% at 1440p, and 15% at 4K, so fairly constant scaling there.
Nearly an identical body charges in Doom Eternal and this time it was the Radeon GPU that pulled forward at 4K, albeit by only a 5% margin. Typically, it’s the opposite manner round, however I consider the 6700 XT has a slight efficiency benefit right here because of the bigger VRAM buffer. Doom Eternal makes use of as much as 9GB of VRAM at 4K, so the spill over into system reminiscence does lead to a slight efficiency hit for the RTX 3070.
At 1080p and 1440p body charges are excessively excessive, so the margins there don’t actually matter, however as luck would have it each delivered the identical expertise.
Speaking of VRAM, I needed to incorporate these Ghost Recon Breakpoint outcomes utilizing the ultra-quality preset, which isn’t the utmost preset which is known as ‘ultimate’. These outcomes may look a bit off at first look as a result of at 1080p they’re neck and neck, then at 1440p the GeForce GPU pulls forward, however lastly operating at 4K it’s the 6700 XT delivering greater than twice the efficiency.
This is a superb instance of what occurs once you run out of VRAM. The 8GB buffer on the RTX 3070 is overwhelmed as the sport requires 9.5 GB of reminiscence at this setting. As a consequence, recreation belongings begin flowing by way of the PCI Express bus into system reminiscence at a considerably slower fee than native VRAM.
Of course, the straightforward repair right here is to decrease the demand on VRAM by lowering texture measurement, for instance. The recreation in all probability requires solely minor tweaks to unravel the issue, however you can be lowering visuals to get the sport operating at a passable stage. Which does make us surprise how lengthy it will likely be earlier than that is normal working process for these with 8GB graphics playing cards.
Last up we now have Kingdom Come Deliverance. We needed to go over these outcomes as a result of when testing the RX 6800 collection we observed how AMD Big Navi GPUs have been affected by efficiency points in video games utilizing the CryEngine, like this one.
The RX 6800, for instance, was capped at 71 fps at 1080p and 65 fps at 1440p. Thankfully, it appears like AMD has addressed these points as a result of the 6700 XT is now capable of render 109 fps on common at 1080p and 84 fps at 1440p. It’s nonetheless slower than the RTX 3070, however efficiency is extra the place you’d anticipate it to be.
That’s how the Radeon 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 match up in 16 of the 45 video games we examined. Instead of getting you spend an unlimited quantity of your time going over the opposite 30 graphs, right here’s a abstract of the outcomes at 1080p and 1440p.
At 1080p, throughout the 45 video games examined, we see that the 6700 XT is on common 4% slower than the RTX 3070, which is precisely what we present in our day-one assessment utilizing a choose 14 recreation pattern. Of the 45 video games, there have been a few dozen the place the 6700 XT was slower by a ten% margin or higher. Control and Apex Legends may very well be thought-about the outliers on this knowledge.
For these questioning although, if we eliminated Control and Apex Legends outcomes, the 6700 XT remains to be 4% slower on common. That’s nonetheless shut sufficient to name a technical draw, albeit in case you’re an avid Fortnite or Apex Legends participant, you may need to go together with the RTX 3070, however in case you’re into Battlefield V, the 6700 XT is perhaps a better option.
Now at 1440p the hole does widen. It’s removed from vital general, however right here the 6700 XT is 8% slower on common. It was additionally slower by a ten% or higher margin in 17 of the video games examined. Basically, for 1440p gaming the RTX 3070 isn’t solely the quicker product but in addition the higher worth product, so not an excellent scenario for AMD.
What We Learned
There you could have it. For these of you eager to see how the Radeon RX 6700 XT and GeForce RTX 3070 examine in an enormous vary of video games, you could have your reply. Things haven’t modified a lot from our day-one evaluations. The 6700 XT fared somewhat worse at 1440p, however in the end it doesn’t change our conclusion.
If you had the posh of shopping for both GPU at or close to the MSRP, which one must you get? Between the 2, our choose can be the GeForce RTX 3070.
It simply occurs to be the case I’m a Fortnite participant and the GeForce GPU is already quicker earlier than you even allow DLSS, making it the plain selection for me. I additionally solely play multiplayer video games and usually go for competitive-type high quality settings, so reminiscence capability isn’t a difficulty.
We additionally like the upper recording high quality when utilizing NVENC. It’s a small enchancment when recording, however it’s higher and in case you stream it’s lots higher.
The Radeon RX 6700 XT stays a strong graphics card and may maintain up properly into the longer term, largely due to that 12GB VRAM buffer. We’re beginning to see a number of examples the place you may run out of reminiscence with 8GB of VRAM, although they’re nonetheless few and much between. Right now, you may simply get away with an 8GB body buffer, however whether or not or not that can be true in a yr or two stays to be seen. I’m somewhat uncertain, not less than for these in search of most in-game visuals.
As we’ve mentioned earlier than, the Radeon 6700 XT may very well be made a extra compelling selection by undercutting the RTX 3070’s pricing, however due to the present scenario and GPU demand, it merely doesn’t make sense for AMD to take any such steps. In a state of affairs the place we’re again to MSRP pricing throughout the board, the 6700 XT would should be priced no greater than $400 — the identical value because the 5700 XT — to change into my best choice on this shootout.
Ray tracing assist retains maturing, however as you probably know by now, that’s of zero curiosity to me. It’s nonetheless a further function of the GeForce RTX collection which you will care about. DLSS support can also be quite restricted, however in case you can make the most of it within the video games you play, the efficiency advantages will be fairly substantial.
One final thing to notice. While I do want the RTX 3070 over the 6700 XT, the RX 6800 turns into an attention-grabbing proposition at $580. That’s 16% greater than the 3070, however these additional $80 get you twice the VRAM and for those who like to carry onto their graphics card for greater than 2 years, I really feel the additional VRAM will come into play, assuming you play the newest titles with the visuals maxed out. It’s additionally 11% quicker at 1440p in response to our testing, and even with out DLSS, you’re properly over 144 fps in a recreation like Fortnite.
But again to our two-way comparability, whereas the 6700 XT provides extra VRAM and is meant to be barely inexpensive, it’s not compelling sufficient given the inferior encoding assist, weaker general efficiency, and present lack of a DLSS competitor. And that’s actually all I’ve to say on this one.