Remember hydroxychloroquine, the drug that some have been pushing as a doable technique to stop Covid-19? Well, the World Health Organization (WHO) is now saying fugget about it.
The BMJ has printed a “living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19,” and on it’s the assertion, “We recommend against administering hydroxychloroquine to prevent Covid-19.” This is predicated on a assessment of accessible proof, primarily six randomized managed trials involving over 6,000 contributors, by the WHO Guideline Development Group (GDG) panel of worldwide specialists. There was no significant distinction in charges of Covid-19 an infection diagnoses, hospitalizations, and demise between individuals who had taken hydroxychloroquine and people who had not. At the identical time, taking hydroxychloroquine introduced the chance of hostile results like coronary heart rhythm issues, blood and lymph system problems, kidney accidents, and liver issues from the remedy usually used towards malaria. It’s referred to as a “living” guideline as a result of the WHO plans on including suggestions about different medication being thought of to stop Covid-19.
That means individuals and states like Oklahoma that bought hydroxychloroquine after then-U.S. President and now Mara-A-Lago resident Donald Trump touted the remedy at the moment are caught with stockpiles of these things. That is until the U.S. is overrun by malaria-carrying mosquitoes anytime quickly. And take a wild guess as to who finally has needed to pay for these stockpiles which will go unused and expire? If you reside in a state like Oklahoma, go to the toilet, look within the mirror, and level at your self. Yes, that’s proper, taxpayers needed to pay for the stuff.
That’s why the Oklahoma legal professional basic’s workplace is outwardly making an attempt to barter a return of 1.2 million hydroxychloroquine drugs that the state bought in April final 12 months from FFF Enterprises for round $2 million, according to Sean Murphy reporting for the AP. Jimmy Kimmel just lately parodied their state of affairs with an Oklahoma “travel” business:
Yeah, attempting to get a refund of round $2 million shouldn’t be precisely as simple as getting your a refund for the faux butt underwear that you just purchased on-line. The provider can at all times say, “umm, but you bought it, and we can’t re-sell it. Because no one freaking wants that much hydroxychloroquine now.”
Governor Kevin Stitt (R) reportedly defended the acquisition final 12 months by saying, “I was being proactive to try and protect Oklahomans.” Protect Oklahomans? Based on what proof? At no level have been actual public well being specialists within the U.S. saying “stockpile hydroxychloroquine.”
Proactive wasn’t precisely the theme of an article written on January 18, 2021, by Carmen Forman for The Oklahoman entitled, “As coronavirus surges in Oklahoma, Gov. Kevin Stitt mum on next steps.” In the article, Forman talked about that “Oklahoma has been the worst state for test positivity and ranked fourth-highest for new Covid-19 cases per capita.” She additionally wrote that “asked what, if any, new steps Stitt is considering to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in Oklahoma, his office did not give specifics and leaned on the governor’s oft-used mantra of ‘personal responsibility.’” Well, appears to be like like Oklahoma state residents have been personally answerable for paying for all these doses of unused hydroxychloroquine.
One of the most important tragedies of 2020 and 2021 has been political leaders not heeding the recommendation of actual scientific and public well being specialists. While public well being specialists within the U.S. have been pushing for related insurance policies and interventions that efficiently managed the unfold of the virus in nations like South Korea, Taiwan, and New Zealand, political leaders like Trump and others didn’t appear to be listening. It appeared, as a substitute, that they have been listening to the voices pushing for using hydroxychloroquine. Some of those voices could have really been individuals attempting to promote hydroxychloroquine. After all, when do you get an opportunity to promote to taxpayers over a million doses of an anti-malarial remedy within the U.S.?