JNU college students problem dismissal of bail plea; HC seeks AAP govt, police stand

by akoloy


The Delhi High Court Friday sought response of the AAP authorities and police on appeals by JNU college students Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita in opposition to the dismissal of their bail pleas by a trial courtroom in a UAPA case associated to the north-east Delhi riots final 12 months.

A bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and A J Bhambhani issued discover to the Delhi authorities and police and sought their stand on the 2 appeals by March 10, the following date of listening to.

Advocate Adit S Pujari, showing for the 2 college students, argued earlier than the bench that the investigation within the case was “tainted”.

Narwal and Kalita, who’re additionally members of Pinjra Tod (break the cage) group, have been arrested final 12 months in May in reference to the communal riots in north-east Delhi and are in judicial custody.

They have been arrested by the Crime Branch of the Delhi Police and booked underneath numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code together with rioting, illegal meeting and try to homicide.

They have additionally been booked underneath the stringent anti-terror legislation – Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in a separate case associated to the communal violence in north-east Delhi in February final 12 months, for allegedly being a part of a “premeditated conspiracy” within the riots.

Communal clashes had damaged out in north-east Delhi on February 24, 2020 after violence between the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) supporters and protesters spiralled uncontrolled leaving not less than 53 folks useless and round 200 injured.

In all, 4 circumstances have been registered in opposition to Kalita, together with in relation to the northeast Delhi riots and violence in outdated Delhi’s Daryaganj space throughout protests in opposition to the CAA in December 2019.

Narwal is accused in three circumstances.

Both of them have been granted bail within the different circumstances apart from the one underneath UAPA.

The trial courtroom had on January 28 dismissed their bail pleas saying the allegations in opposition to them have been prima facie true and provisions of anti-terror legislation have been rightly invoked within the current case.





Source link

You may also like

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

We are happy to introduce our utube Channel

Subscribe to get curated news from various unbias news channels
0 Shares
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap